Leading off the site, we will answer “the 5 Ws” (who, what, when, where, and why) of Christian anarchism. But as we will conclude this first post with these simplified fundamental answers, we must first build preconditions.

We will start by defining our terms. Then we will state a theorem. Next we will attempt up front to reconcile any objections. Lastly, we will draw a conclusion.

Definitions

Christianity: The religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. Christians believe that Jesus Christ is the Messiah, sent by God. They believe that Jesus, by dying and rising from the dead, made up for the sin of Adam and thus redeemed the world, allowing all who believe in him to enter heaven. Christians rely on the Bible as the inspired word of God. 1

addendum: As Christians, we believe that Jesus Christ is our spiritual King. Christ is God in essence, but is the Son in person.

anarchism: The belief that all existing governmental authority should be abolished and replaced by free cooperation among individuals. 2

addendum: Many different “types” of anarchism are claimed, but we submit that anarcho-capitalism is the only true form of anarchism. We advocate a strictly peaceful transition to anarchism; read the About page for more.

Therefore, we can form a definition for Christian anarchism: the advocacy of adherence to the Word of Christ – the Law of God – instead of government, the laws of man.

addendum: Note also that we do not advocate a society where all members must necessarily be Christians. We merely hold that Christians should conform to the tenets of anarchism in order to exercise a consistent worldview and moral existence; read the About page for more.

Theorem

Assuming the above definitions and a basic understanding of first principles behind Christianity and anarchism, we can posit a theorem:

God is the Creator and commands our worship

Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

Exodus 20:5

As our Creator, God wants us to focus on and devote our time (and a small portion of money) to Him and to advancing His kingdom.

God should be the center of our lives

“Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock.

Matthew 7:24

When we make God our Rock, our lives will gain stability and comfort, and we will gain wisdom.

God is Love and all that is moral and good

Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.

1 John 4:8

God is the ultimate Perfection, the highest standard of Good, and we are called to strive to live up to His greatness, though we know we will stumble every day.

Love is the greatest commandment

And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.

1 Corinthians 13:13

We know that the greatest way we can honor the Lord is to love one another to the absolute. Not just in the ways that comfort us, but in the ways that humble us, as well.

Love is an intrinsic tenet of non-aggression

The non-aggression principle holds that it is immoral to use any order of force against another who has not first initiated aggression (i.e., innocent or peaceful persons).

Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
This is the first and great commandment.
And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Matthew 22:36-39

Love your neighbor as yourself. A simple instruction, one which most of us probably grew up hearing and repeating. But statism does not honor this principle – in fact, it is diametrically opposed. How so?

Statism is aggression

Statism is funded via forcible, involuntary extortion under the euphemism of “taxation”. At its most fundamental level, statism sends its enforcement agents to your door to take a percentage of your wealth, whether you’ve agreed to this or not. If you refuse to “pay up”, the agents will attempt to imprison you. If you refuse to be imprisoned, the agents will attempt to kill you. Statism, metaphorically, is a gun.

Statism is the opposite of Love

If statism is aggression, aggression is the opposite of non-aggression, and non-aggression is the practice and manifestation of Love, then statism is the opposite of Love.

Therefore we should be morally opposed to statism

If God is Love and statism is the opposite of Love, then statism is the opposite of God. Therefore, as Christians, we should be morally opposed to statism.

Scriptural Support

So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the Law of Liberty!

James 2:12

James makes clear the fact that the Law of Liberty, or God’s Word, is to be our moral standard.

Jesus called them together and said, “You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

Mark 10:42-45

Jesus teaches that his disciples should not be “rulers”, or “archists”. Therefore, what should they be?

Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men!
The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.

Acts 5:29-30

The apostles are absolutely lucent here: we ought to obey God rather than men. God raised a perfect Son; mankind destroyed him. How can we entrust power or lawmaking to any man? The state itself crucified the embodiment of Love and Salvation in the flesh!

Thou shalt not steal.

Exodus 20:15

One of the Ten Commandments, this is a most primary (both basic and important) law which most of us probably learned even before our motor skills were fully functional. However, somewhere along the way, we starting making exceptions to this rule. When the state forcibly and involuntarily extorts property from a person, they are stealing. If any person on his own used force to take someone’s property against their will, we would recognize it for what it is: theft. How then do we make the logical leap that it is a moral act if condoned by the majority or if exercised by a man in a uniform?

For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 5:20

Jesus claims that the “teachers of the law” (man’s law) are unrighteous!

Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne:
Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.

Matthew 5:33-35

We are taught not to join into oaths with other men, but to let “yes” be yes and “no” be no. We see a direct opposition to that in cultural traditions such as the Pledge of Allegiance.

If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that?

Matthew 5:46

Throughout Scripture, Jesus refers to the tax collectors (also known as publicans) as the epitome of the evil, sinful, and unrighteous. This is reinforced in The Parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector, Zacchaeus the Tax Collector, and many other times.

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

Matthew 6:24

Again, the clarity of the statement shines bright: we are to have no other master but God the Father.

For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous. (Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them.) This will take place on the day when God judges people’s secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.

Romans 2:13-16

Paul tells us here that God’s Law is written on their hearts of all men, even the unbeliever whom does not keep God’s Law. Because of Christ, man’s need for governments was itself abolished; for where the Law was required to be taught and kept by governments, it is now known to every man instinctively in their heart, and whether or not they recognize it as such, they are convicted in their consciences by the Holy Spirit.

Objections

But doesn’t the Bible tell us to be subordinate to our government?

No doubt, the Bible references submission to authority:

Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.

Romans 13:1

But the Bible also has something similar to say about slavery:

Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord.

Colossians 3:22

What can we infer from the latter verse? Does this imply that God honors or condones slavery? Or does it actually manifest God’s understanding of the times, a recognition of the reality of the evils that man has created that others must endure?

But anarchism doesn’t account for the sinful nature of man!

Ah, but it does! In fact, it is the only system which does so logically. The theory behind statism is, in order to ebb the sinful nature of man, to put other men (of sinful nature) in positions of power over them! What a farce! Is it any wonder how quickly governments become overrun through and through by corruption? No, the only wonder is how this idea of statism, what can only be seen as a bad joke, has instead been passed down through the generations into loving arms each time – a familiar demon.

A common manifestation of this position is a negative response to the question “can man govern himself?”. On the contrary, we would submit: if man cannot govern himself, how then can he govern others?!

But in anarchism, how would X get done?

Anarchism does have practical solutions for every problem that statists argue must be dealt with by the state, and in the near future we will examine how some of the most imminent problems can be dealt with in the free market. But the greater issue is something we have already established: statism is immoral. At a personal level, we know it is immoral to steal from or use violence on an innocent person for any reason; whether to procure our own security, our well-being, etc. Regardless, there is no requirement for alternate solutions to exist, to simply know that the existing “solution” (or, more accurately, problem) is bad and should therefore be ceased.

Okay, but how could any of this actually happen?

Our first response is, certainly not overnight. As of this very moment, Christianarchism is “theoretical in practice, practical in theory” – i.e., we know it could work, but it would not work tomorrow. Only via an intellectual revolution/enlightenment/renaissance period similar to that during the founding of America, or of the Golden Age, whereby the populace comes to an awakening of both spiritual and philosophical principles, do we believe that a transition to anarchism is possible. Whereas we may advocate passive resistance and civil disobedience, we do not condone a violent uprising or overthrow of any sort, as such acts would be unscriptural, immoral, and nonviable.

Here are some viable possibilities as to how we as Christians could come to live freely via Scriptural means:

  • because rational anarchists continue to bring about a greater understanding of the virtues of anarchism, there is an intellectual revolution/enlightenment/renaissance period like there was at the US nation’s founding, and 30 years from now the populace votes in someone (or a party) whose platform is to disband the state and go to a system of anarcho-capitalism.
  • the US government collapses in 20 years (which at this clearly unsustainable rate is inevitable) and everyone has to decide on a new state, or none at all.
  • a “Free State Project” succeeds and peaceably secedes from the Union.

Finally: the 5 Ws

Who: We believe that all men should be given the opportunity to live in a truly free society. However, strictly due to geographical location, our primary focus is on the people of the United States of America.

What: Anarchism; an accountability to God instead of government.

When: After an understanding of the virtues of anarchism have pervaded the society and the people of the intellectual revolution choose to cast off their chains, peaceably, as one.

Where: Everywhere, but specifically, North America. See “Who”, above.

and, most importantly, Why: Because Love and therefore non-aggression is not only the only moral system of man, but also because Love is God’s greatest commandment and until each of us fulfills that commandment – not only in body, but in mind – we are in rebellion towards God.

sources
  1. “Christianity.” The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005. 12 Mar. 2011. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Christianity>.
  2. “anarchism.” The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2005. 12 Mar. 2011. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anarchism>.

 

  1. Jill C Z says:

    Can you delve into Romans 13: 1-3 further? I’m wondering if what you are looking for is a Righteous Republic, rather than true anarchy.

  2. Great question! Personally, I would have no qualms living in a Righteous Republic; however, that is not what I endorse, as I do not believe in using force (or retribution) to hold others to a religious standard against their volition, outside of the non-aggression principle and its necessary descendants (such as contract).

  3. TravisAnCap says:

    Hey Christianarch I think this short article would be interesting to you http://www.tektonics.org/lp/obeylaw.html
    I always assumed that Nero and Rome was oppressive to Christians from the start.
    Also this one http://anti-state.com/article.php?article_id=307
    I didn’t know there was no compulsory taxation in Rome until 212 AD.